03年考研英语一阅读text4

Ⅰ 考研英语一2003年text2的一句翻译

两句话都不妥，第一句话把anyone翻译成“有人”，第二句话应该把“是不是”去掉，应该这样说“许多人都感到困惑，（竟然）任何人都可以随意伤害动物”。

Ⅱ 2002考研英语text4 第四段 无法理解

我是11年才参加过考研的，由于今年题比较简单，分数还可以，82分
我做这篇阅读的时候，也比较费解，不知道你是不是也是看的张剑的那本，所以当你提到这个的时候，我印象很深刻
先谈你所说的问题吧，我当时对shield的理解是保护，使之免受。。。。的困惑，不知道你注意到没有，Nancy所说的那句话，虽然是通过” “直接引用的，但是用的是完成时，而不是习惯上的untill now are still very,very strongly insisting that 。。。。。所以，我觉得，如果翻译成：
Nancy认为：这一原则将使那些医生消除疑虑，在此之前，他们一直强烈地认为，如果给病人充分的药品来止痛会加速他们的死亡的话，那就不能这样做，（因为可能要承担法律责任）。

而上文中，提到了最高法开始认可这一存在了几个世纪的原则，并且医生们也在近年开始利用这一原则为自己滥用药品开脱。这样，上下文，就能比较好的衔接上了。并且，我看到过一本新东方的翻译，意思也与这个差多。

其次，我再废话几句吧，考研的英语，主要就是阅读，而阅读，又以单词和思路最为重要，你单词如果过关，再加上能这样仔细的分析。相信坚持下去，会取得非常好的成绩。现在，我个人觉得啊，你着重应该研究的是05-11的阅读的，之前的，稍有一点简单和过时。现在的阅读，像你提到的这种，光凭单词直译，很难理解完全的情况越来越多。

最后，祝你成功！

Ⅲ 请问谁有2003年到2013年考研英语的阅读和阅读译文真题啊~紧急求啊。

http://wenku..com/link?url=5XPuc1nZO1iVqqLxZVQuTMGqO_SVbOMUSwq&rt=1&rt=1

Ⅳ 考研英语2003年text1

outsider status 指局外人身份 whereby 凭借的是 动作的发出者是第三方：情报事务所，上文有提雇员里有从事情报工版作的人权 第五段第二句 整句意思：那个公司的简报听起来不象华盛顿往来公文中的常见套话，情报事务所借此回避那些声明 以免出错。希望能帮到你。我们一起加油共勉

Ⅳ 考研英语阅读，2007年，text4，Left什么意思seen as a concern onl

这里的left应该是leave的过去分词，until now只是插进来的，left to才是应该连在一内起的容，left to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, 所以这里的left to你应该知道是什么意思了。
这里的seen也是see的过去分词，而see是看的意思，所以根据文中意思，这里翻译成"被关注"比较贴切，所以这里断句应该是seen/as a concern/only of data-rich instries/such as banking.
所以整个句子的意思大概是：以前这些信息的保密工作一直都是留给(注意：这里的"留给"就是left to)一些没什么水准的员工去处理，而且只被一些涉及大量数据的行业，像银行啊电信啊航空行业这些所关注(它的保密工作←这是我自己加的，便于你理解)。

Ⅵ 2013年英语一阅读text4是不是太难了点儿

2013年英语一阅读text4确实来是非常自难了。

每年考试过后8月份或9月份公布成绩并颁发成绩单，根据教育部规定四六级考试不设置及格线，四级425分（含425分）以上可以报考六级，所以大家普遍认为四六级的合格线为425分。

英语四六级的分数是排位分，没有总分。报名时间CET全国英语四六级考试的考试时间为：每年6月份、12月份（每年时间略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思听力得5分，即达到中国英语能力等级量表四级水平。

Ⅶ 求助 关于考研英语一真题2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers’ ty to withhold immigrants’information.
[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states’ interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states’ support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

Ⅷ 谁有2015年考研英语一的阅读理解text1-4的翻译~~请赐给我吧~~

你买本真题书就行了，上面都有，虽然我今年考得，但是我都忘啦

Ⅸ 考研英语2001 text4第三题

[D] 意为：标准石油抄联合公司可能曾袭对竞争形成过威胁。
第四段第一、二句提到，要找出目前合并热潮带来的利益和降低成本的例子还很困难，但是，如果现在有几个石油公司合并，很难想像会再次产生近乎100年前所引起人们恐慌的对（公平）竞争的威胁，这一情况当时是由于美国的标准石油联合公司解体而造成的。
A意为：日益增长的合并热潮肯定会损害顾客的利益。第四段第三、四、五句提到，像WorldCom这样的电信公司合并几乎没有给消费者带来更高的价格，或减缓技术进步的步伐，相反，通信业务的价格迅速降低；汽车工业也在合并，但也没有迹象表明消费者的利益受到伤害。
B意为：WorldCom是一个（合并）带来利益和降低成本的好例子。参阅第四段第三句，这句强调的是价格没有随着合并而提高，并没有提到价格降低问题，因此，合并虽然没有伤害消费者，也没有给他们带来利益。
C意为：全球化过程成本巨大。本段没有涉及这方面的问题。

更多考研精彩信息请打开 to4.cn/ayM6