英语对话形式作文应该怎么写

⑴ 帮我写一篇英语作文！对话形式的，四个角色。

Eric; Hello，Linda，how are you today? Did you have a nice weekend?
Linda: hi, Eirc, how are you? I am fine, and you?
Eric: I had a pretty good weekend with my two sisters, Lucy and Lily. This is Lucy, and this is Lily
Lucy and Lily: Hello, Linda, we are his sisters.
Lucy: I am twice bigger than him and Lily is the youngest in our family.
Lily: Hi, Linda, nice to see you.
Linda,: Nice to see you guys. you are so pretty, what's your hobby?
Lucy: I like movies, playing piano etc(根据实际情况进行更改）
Lily： I like XXXX（根据实际情况）
Linda: there is a new movie released ， would you like to go with me？
Lucy and Lily： That's wonderful，we'd like to, we are so glad to meet you.
Lily： Can you take us as your friends?
Linda: you are so nice!
(不知道你的水平是什么，根据自己的情况修改吧，希望能够帮到你）

⑵ 用下面的对话写一篇英语作文

初一就这么难的题目了啊,现在的教育真不得了了.我编的对话不知道有没有超出初一的范围,楼主先看看吧.
A:Hey Tom,look at my new PSP!
B:Cool!What can it do?
A:You can use it to listen to musics,play video games and read e books.
B:Gee!It's really a powerful machine.
A:Of course,nowadays the technology is developing faster and faster.
B:Yes,and a lot of inventions are coming out every day.
A:I think people now are enjoying the conveninece brought by these inventions.
B:I agree with you.For example cars shorten the real distance of the world,while internet shorten the visual space of the world.
A:Exactly,and that's why now the world is called "Village of Earth".
B:But although people gain convenience from inventions,they have paid some cost.
A:What kind of cost?
B:Those advanced machines make people much lazier and unhealthier than before.
A:I can only partially agree with you.Many people will use machines to do their work,so they are becoming lazier.
B:So you don't think people are getting unhealthier?
A:Of course not.As medical techonology is so advanced,new medicine can cure all kinds of diseases.
B:But don't you think these diseases are caused by people's laziness?
A:Er,maybe you are right.But it will make people invent better medicines.
B:As you know in ancient times,people didn't have such effective machines,they can only rely on their hands and hardwork.
A:You mean we should do more exercise everyday to keep healthy?
B:You mean it.In a word,inventions have advantages as well as disadvantages.We should make good use of them.
A:You are right.

⑶ 用对话的方式写国庆节作文用英语怎么写,还要有汉语

风卷开书页，雨悄悄地点在窗上。
他生在贵族奢华的宫殿中，呐喊在冰冷的国土上，死在绝望与迷惘之中。
“列夫?托尔斯泰”我喃喃道。一位身躯与思想的苦行者，文学使他的思想更脱凡。
雨使整个城市昏昏沉沉，汽车轧过水洼，沉积的雨水再次扬向天空，片刻后再次洒在路牙石上，郁郁寡欢地再次扎堆，电线的常客垂着头躲在风雨吹打不到的地方，一只流浪的猫飞一般地穿过广场，抑郁的黄眼睛发出微弱的幽光。
我站在阳台上，忍受着雨声，为百年之前的文学泰斗轻轻叹惋。他的文学鼓舞了世界，却鼓舞他自己。他曾经穿过一个西伯利亚，经历过战争，苦难，找到了他心中的理想社会，最终却痛苦地发现，这理想中的社会永远无法真正的出现……
窗外的雨已经停了，路灯亮起温暖的光，我定定地望着它，却突然看到一只肥胖且灰不溜秋的东西，在等边不停地飞舞，我有些厌恶地挪开了目光，寻找那颗属于托尔斯泰的星，书里的他坚持着自己的理想，却又被现实所羁绊，他绝望地死去，却将精神留在了人间。
忽然，“铛铛”声传入了我的耳中，我望见了那只飞蛾，开始一下又一下地撞向路灯。“可笑”我看着它无畏地一下又一下撞击着灯，却永远够不到那一份热，可它还是执着地，不假思索地冲击着，朦胧的“当当”声对我却似乎相当有力，一下又一下地撞在我的心里。列夫·托尔斯泰我突然想到了他，他就像那只愚蠢的飞蛾一样，挥舞着翅膀——他的笔，一下又一下向光明进军，执着的精神使他穿过西伯利亚，穿过战争与苦难，穿过黑暗面前，可他却被迫停止了，却无法超越。最终，他含着痛苦逝去。一只飞蛾让我认识到了他，而他的精神又着实令我感动。
桌上仍伏着那本书，而清晨的阳光则照亮了伟人的名字。

⑷ 英语对话作文格式

A: Xiao Ming, were you happy last Sunday?B: Yes. What about you? A: Oh, me,too. May I ask you some questions about your Sunday?B: Sure.A: What were you doing at nine in the evening?B: Oh, I was watcing TV in the sofa.A: What were your parents doing while you were watching TV?B: Oh, we were all watching TV then. A: And your brother?B: No, he was studying for Monday's math test.A: When did you go to sleep?B: About 10:30.A: Oh, it's too late. I think we should go to bed early.B: Thanks. I won't do that again.

⑸ 写一篇介绍家庭成员的英语作文 对话的形式

这个只要营造出对话氛围就好了，可以重点写下记忆深刻的某件事，

⑹ 写英语作文，用对话的形式

你好，刚刚给你发过去了，绝对原创，希望能被采纳。

⑺ 改变对话形式写一篇英语小短文

jane met kangkang at the school gate .they greated to each.then,jane introced helen to kangkang .kangkan said happy new year to helen .helen said too and she also asid kangkang's bike looked very nice .then she asked kangkang did he often come to school by bike .kangkang said yes .helen told him she usually by subway .jane said she usually come to school by bus.finally ,they find it is time for class .so they hurry to class .

很抑郁抄的写了一点
看这对话应该是刚学英语吧
那这篇作文已经够可以了
希望有用吧

⑻ 英语对话作文

“Don't scientists have a responsibility to use animals in order to find cures for human diseases?”

Ecating people and encouraging them to avoid fat and cholesterol, quit smoking, rece alcohol and other drug consumption, exercise regularly, and clean up the environment will save more human lives and prevent more human suffering than all the animal tests in the world. Animal tests are primitive, and modern technology and human clinical tests are much more effective and reliable.
Even if we had no alternative to using animals, which is not the case, animal testing would still be ethically unacceptable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “You do not settle whether an experiment is justified or not by merely showing that it is of some use. The distinction is not between useful and useless experiments, but between barbarous and civilized behaviour.” After all, there are probably some medical problems that can only be cured by testing on unwilling humans, but we don’ conct such tests because we recognize that it would be wrong to do so.

“If we didn’t use animals, wouldn’t we have to test new drugs on people?”

The choice isn’t between animals and people. There is no guarantee that drugs are safe—even if they have been tested on animals—because the physiological differences between humans and other animals prevent the results of animal tests from being accurately extrapolated to humans. Some drugs that have been approved through animal tests can cause serious and unexpected side effects for humans. A 2002 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that in the last 25 years, more than 50 FDA-approved drugs had to be taken off the market or relabeled because they caused “adverse reactions.” In 2000 alone, the prescription drugs removed from the market were the popular heartburn drug Propulsid (removed because it caused “fatal heart rhythm abnormalities”), the diabetes drug Rezulin (“removed after causing liver failure”), and the irritable-bowel-syndrome treatment Lotronex (“removed for causing fatal constipation and colitis”). According to the study’s lead author, “Millions of patients are exposed to potentially unsafe drugs each year.”

If the pharmaceutical instry switched from animal experiments to quantum pharmacology and in vitro tests, we would be better protected from harmful drugs, not less protected.

“If we didn’t test on animals, how would we conct medical research?”

Human clinical and epidemiological studies, studies on cadavers, and computer simulations are faster, more reliable, less expensive, and more humane than animal tests. Ingenious scientists have used human brain cells to develop a model “microbrain” that can be used to study tumors and have also come up with artificial skin and bone marrow. Instead of killing animals, we can now test irritancy on egg membranes, proce vaccines from cell cultures, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples. As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratories—a company that uses only human tissue and computers to develop and test its drugs—says, “If you have information on human genes, what’s the point of going back to animals?”

“Doesn't animal experimentation help animals by advancing veterinary science?”

The point is not whether animal experimentation can be useful to animals or humans; the point is that we do not have the moral right to inflict unnecessary suffering on those who are at our mercy. Saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on animals to advance veterinary science is like saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on poor children to benefit rich ones.

“Don’t medical students have to dissect animals?”

No, they don’t. In fact, more and more medical students are becoming conscientious objectors who choose to learn by assisting experienced surgeons instead of by using animals. In Great Britain, it is against the law for medical students to practice surgery on animals, and British physicians are just as competent as those who were ecated elsewhere. Many of the leading U.S. medical schools, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, now use innovative, clinical teaching methods instead of cruel animal laboratories. Harvard, for instance, offers a cardiac-anesthesia practicum in which students observe human heart bypass operations instead of performing terminal surgery on dogs. The Harvard staff members who developed this practicum have recommended that it be implemented elsewhere.

“Should we throw out all the drugs that were developed and tested on animals? Would you refuse to take them?”

Unfortunately, a number of things in our society came about through the exploitation of others. For instance, many of the roads that we drive on were built by slaves. We can’t change the past; those who have already suffered and died are lost. But what we can do is change the future by using non-animal research methods from now on.

“Don't scientists care about the animals they experiment on? Doesn't their research depend on the animals’ well-being?”

Investigations at even the most prestigious institutions show that this is simply not the case. At the City of Hope in California, one of the country’s most prominent research facilities, animals starved to death and drowned in their own feces. Many experimenters become calloused after years of research and don’t see the animals’ suffering. They treat animals like disposable tools and consider proper animal care to be too expensive.

“Don't peer-review and animal-care committees prevent animal cruelty at institutions?”

No, because many such committees are composed mainly or completely of people who have vested interests in the continuation of animal experimentation. Members of the public were not allowed access to committee meetings until lawsuits were filed.

“Cats and dogs are killed in pounds anyway, so why not let them be used in experiments to save lives?”

A painless death at an animal shelter is a far cry from a life of severe pain and deprivation and an agonizing death in a laboratory.

“Would you support an experiment that would sacrifice 10 animals to save 10,000 people?”

No. Look at it another way: Suppose that the only way to save 10,000 people was to experiment on one mentally challenged orphan. If saving people is the goal, wouldn’t that be worth it? Most people would agree that it would be wrong to sacrifice one human for the “greater good” of others because it would violate that indivial’s rights, but when it comes to sacrificing animals, the assumption is that human beings have rights and animals do not. Yet there is no logical reason to deny animals the same rights that protect indivial humans from being sacrificed for the common good.

“What about experiments in which animals are observed and not harmed?”
If there really is no harm, we don’t object. But “no harm” means that animals aren’t isolated in barren, cold steel cages because even confinement causes stress and fear, as shown by the differences in blood pressure between caged and free animals. Caged animals also suffer because they are prevented from performing their normal behaviors and social interactions.

“If you were in a fire and could save either your child or your dog, who would you choose?”

I would save my child, but that’s just instinct. A dog would save her pup. Regardless, my choice proves nothing about the moral legitimacy of animal experiments. I might save my own child instead of my neighbor’s, but that hardly proves that experimentation on my neighbor’s child is acceptable.

“Why Should Animals Have Rights?”

Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. For more information, click here.

EU proposes to strengthen protection of animals used in scientific experiments

The European Commission on Wednesday proposed legislation to strengthen the protection of animals used in scientific experiments and to minimize the number of animals being tested on.

The proposal, which intends to strengthen existing European Union (EU) legislation, asks ethical evaluations to be carried out before projects using animals are authorized and lays down minimum requirements on housing and animal care.

The proposed directive covers all live non-human vertebrate animals plus certain other species likely to experience pain. The use of non-human primates is subject to restrictions, and the use of great apes -- chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans -- is banned in scientific proceres. Only when survival of the species itself is at stake, or in the case of an unexpected outbreak of a life-threatening or debilitating disease in human beings, can a member state exceptionally be granted permission for their use.

The proposal seeks to ensure that animals are used only where no other means are available. Their use must be fully justifiable and the expected benefits must outweigh the harm caused to the animals. The proposal would also ensure that animals receive suitable care and treatment such as appropriately sized cages and an environment adapted to each species.

The proposal would also require projects involving animals to be authorized by a competent authority before they can go ahead. Organizations wishing to breed, supply or use animals would be obliged to seek authorization for their activities and for the personnel working with the animals.

"It is absolutely important to steer away from testing on animals. Scientific research must focus on finding alternative methods to animal testing, but where alternatives are not available the situation of animals still used in experiments must be improved," said EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.

⑼ 求一篇有关于对话形式的电影英语作文

自己抄改动一下就行了
·小学英袭语作文 ·初中英语作文 ·高中英语作文 ·大学英语作文 ·考研英语作文 ·中考英语作文 ·高考英语作文 ·英语四级作文 ·英语写作资料 ·GRE作文 ·留学文书写作 ·雅思考试作文 ·英语六级作文
http://www.rrting.com/English/yyxw/这里有近千篇英语作文，希望能帮到你，好就要给分喔,未来几年写作文都不用怕了

⑽ (关于以对话形式向父母介绍一个朋友)的英语作文

Parents,this is my good friend (你朋友的姓名）. He is a musician. He is (你朋友的年龄，如14） years old now. He often goes to school wish ms . He like eat fruit and vedetable! He can play the piano, the drums, the guitar and the trumpet! He faverite actor is Jet Li, he like Jet Li's movie <Shaoling Temple>. He often goes to a movie with me.
意思：爸爸妈妈，专这是我的好朋友 (你朋友的姓名)。他属是以为音乐家。他现在(你朋友的年龄，如14）了。特常常和我一起去上学。他喜欢吃水果和蔬菜！他能弹钢琴、打鼓、弹吉他和吹喇叭！他最喜爱的演员是李连杰，他喜欢李连杰的电影《少林寺》。他常常和我一起去看电影。
这是我现写现卖的，希望楼主喜欢！