03年考研英語一閱讀text4

Ⅰ 考研英語一2003年text2的一句翻譯

兩句話都不妥，第一句話把anyone翻譯成「有人」，第二句話應該把「是不是」去掉，應該這樣說「許多人都感到困惑，（竟然）任何人都可以隨意傷害動物」。

Ⅱ 2002考研英語text4 第四段 無法理解

我是11年才參加過考研的，由於今年題比較簡單，分數還可以，82分
我做這篇閱讀的時候，也比較費解，不知道你是不是也是看的張劍的那本，所以當你提到這個的時候，我印象很深刻
先談你所說的問題吧，我當時對shield的理解是保護，使之免受。。。。的困惑，不知道你注意到沒有，Nancy所說的那句話，雖然是通過」 「直接引用的，但是用的是完成時，而不是習慣上的untill now are still very,very strongly insisting that 。。。。。所以，我覺得，如果翻譯成：
Nancy認為：這一原則將使那些醫生消除疑慮，在此之前，他們一直強烈地認為，如果給病人充分的葯品來止痛會加速他們的死亡的話，那就不能這樣做，（因為可能要承擔法律責任）。

而上文中，提到了最高法開始認可這一存在了幾個世紀的原則，並且醫生們也在近年開始利用這一原則為自己濫用葯品開脫。這樣，上下文，就能比較好的銜接上了。並且，我看到過一本新東方的翻譯，意思也與這個差多。

其次，我再廢話幾句吧，考研的英語，主要就是閱讀，而閱讀，又以單詞和思路最為重要，你單詞如果過關，再加上能這樣仔細的分析。相信堅持下去，會取得非常好的成績。現在，我個人覺得啊，你著重應該研究的是05-11的閱讀的，之前的，稍有一點簡單和過時。現在的閱讀，像你提到的這種，光憑單詞直譯，很難理解完全的情況越來越多。

最後，祝你成功！

Ⅲ 請問誰有2003年到2013年考研英語的閱讀和閱讀譯文真題啊~緊急求啊。

http://wenku..com/link?url=5XPuc1nZO1iVqqLxZVQuTMGqO_SVbOMUSwq&rt=1&rt=1

Ⅳ 考研英語2003年text1

outsider status 指局外人身份 whereby 憑借的是 動作的發出者是第三方：情報事務所，上文有提雇員里有從事情報工版作的人權 第五段第二句 整句意思：那個公司的簡報聽起來不象華盛頓往來公文中的常見套話，情報事務所藉此迴避那些聲明 以免出錯。希望能幫到你。我們一起加油共勉

Ⅳ 考研英語閱讀，2007年，text4，Left什麼意思seen as a concern onl

這里的left應該是leave的過去分詞，until now只是插進來的，left to才是應該連在一內起的容，left to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, 所以這里的left to你應該知道是什麼意思了。
這里的seen也是see的過去分詞，而see是看的意思，所以根據文中意思，這里翻譯成"被關注"比較貼切，所以這里斷句應該是seen/as a concern/only of data-rich instries/such as banking.
所以整個句子的意思大概是：以前這些信息的保密工作一直都是留給(注意：這里的"留給"就是left to)一些沒什麼水準的員工去處理，而且只被一些涉及大量數據的行業，像銀行啊電信啊航空行業這些所關注(它的保密工作←這是我自己加的，便於你理解)。

Ⅵ 2013年英語一閱讀text4是不是太難了點兒

2013年英語一閱讀text4確實來是非常自難了。

每年考試過後8月份或9月份公布成績並頒發成績單，根據教育部規定四六級考試不設置及格線，四級425分（含425分）以上可以報考六級，所以大家普遍認為四六級的合格線為425分。

英語四六級的分數是排位分，沒有總分。報名時間CET全國英語四六級考試的考試時間為：每年6月份、12月份（每年時間略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中國教育部考試中心與英國文化教育協會在京聯合發布雅思、普思考試與中國英語能力等級量表對接研究結果。雅思聽力得5分，即達到中國英語能力等級量表四級水平。

Ⅶ 求助 關於考研英語一真題2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That』s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as 「a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power」. The White House argued tha Arizona』s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona』s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers』 ty to withhold immigrants』information.
[B] States』 independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States』 legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress』s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states』 interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states』 support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

Ⅷ 誰有2015年考研英語一的閱讀理解text1-4的翻譯~~請賜給我吧~~

你買本真題書就行了，上面都有，雖然我今年考得，但是我都忘啦

Ⅸ 考研英語2001 text4第三題

[D] 意為：標准石油抄聯合公司可能曾襲對競爭形成過威脅。
第四段第一、二句提到，要找出目前合並熱潮帶來的利益和降低成本的例子還很困難，但是，如果現在有幾個石油公司合並，很難想像會再次產生近乎100年前所引起人們恐慌的對（公平）競爭的威脅，這一情況當時是由於美國的標准石油聯合公司解體而造成的。
A意為：日益增長的合並熱潮肯定會損害顧客的利益。第四段第三、四、五句提到，像WorldCom這樣的電信公司合並幾乎沒有給消費者帶來更高的價格，或減緩技術進步的步伐，相反，通信業務的價格迅速降低；汽車工業也在合並，但也沒有跡象表明消費者的利益受到傷害。
B意為：WorldCom是一個（合並）帶來利益和降低成本的好例子。參閱第四段第三句，這句強調的是價格沒有隨著合並而提高，並沒有提到價格降低問題，因此，合並雖然沒有傷害消費者，也沒有給他們帶來利益。
C意為：全球化過程成本巨大。本段沒有涉及這方面的問題。

更多考研精彩信息請打開 to4.cn/ayM6