怎麼寫英語閱讀報告
① 怎麼寫英語閱讀報告！！！！！！！！！
先寫你讀了什麼書，簡單介紹一下書的信息。如：作者、出版信息、內容包括哪些部分。
然後分章節介紹書的內容，概括大體意思。
最後是總結，包括對書的評價以及自己的心得體會。
② 我剛上大一，我們老師叫我們寫一篇英文版的閱讀報告，該怎麼寫，有哪幾方面
首先就是說一抄下文章的大致內容， 總結一下文章在說什麼，然後挑選出比較觸動你或者吸引你，甚至你不認同的地方著重介紹一下，然後再描述一下你為什麼會覺得那部分有觸動到你，和你的感受是什麼。最後結尾的時候描述一下你對這文章的整體感受。
有需要的話可以把文章發上來，能夠根據文章的特點來給你建議。
③ 英文讀書報告怎麼寫啊
題目復：A Book Report of 。。。寫上書名 書名用斜制體
格式：1.0 Introction 介紹一下書的信息，比如大體內容，包括幾章
2.0 Content of Book 可以再分2.1 2.2 2.3等 概括內容 可以按章節寫 或是別的分類 加一些自己的總結更好
3.0 Conclusion
主要就是這樣
④ 幫我寫一篇250字左右的英文閱讀報告
Personally, I feel that the pay rise does not solve the root of the problem. The pay rise may keep the older members on the team but may not attract new blood when there are jobs with better pay around.
Also, the basic problem for the low morale is the lack of confidence from the public, if the public's confidence is restored, then there will be people willing to join the team.
Although the council hopes that just by increasing the pay, the morale of the team will be better, then they may be wrong. From the few cases of police officers gambling and handling travellers, we can see that the mindset of the officers need to be corrected. They need to define right from wrong, and their ties from what they ought not to do.
Still, this is a good start. Although it does not thoroughly solve the morale question, it does bring to the public that being a police officer can be another choice to consider, and new blood may be introced through this.
那個，很抱歉我半夜寫可能會忽略一些東西，如果喜歡，要檢查一下，真的很抱歉。
⑤ 25篇英語小短文(帶題目,翻澤)，寫閱讀報告。
一、讀書報告的內容可包括：
1．本書的概況：作者簡介、內容概要；本書在表達、處理等方面的特別之處等；
2．本書的主要觀點、意圖；
3．本書的精華部分或個人最喜愛的部分；
4．對本書的評價和觀感；
5．讀後感：（1）書中情節引起的聯想
（2）書中內容引起的疑問
（3）本書令你有何提醒、啟發及反思
（4）本書引起的思想上的轉變
（5）本書令你引發的期望
6．本書讀後的收獲。
二、讀書報告的撰寫步驟：
（一）閱讀著作；
（二）確立論題：每人根據閱讀感受，自由選取一個自己最感興趣的角度確立一個論題；選擇的角度要小，挖掘要深；
（三）收集資料：1、摘記原文：根據論題，摘錄原著中的相關內容，製成摘記卡；
2、查閱其他書籍雜志，掌握相關的資料。
（四）報告的內容：選題理由、確立觀點、論述觀點
（五）注意點：語言的流暢、觀點與論述的一致。
三、寫讀書報告的注意事項
1．讀書報告的形式多種多樣，沒有任何規范。可以寫成很抒情的散文，很尖銳的評論，很精闢的分析，很周詳的比較……要看書的性質，也要看你感想的性質。
2．讀書時要邊看邊寫，不論有什麼感想，疑問和見解，都隨即把它們寫下來。最好准備一本讀書札記簿，寫在本子上。書看完了，把自己寫下來的那些感受瀏覽一次，就會發現幾個重要可以發揮的。把這幾個重點列出來，有時間的話，把書有選擇地再看一遍，以便你想論述的重點，找尋更多的資料或例證。有需要時，還可以再找其它有關的書籍來補充你的論點。這樣，你閱讀的收獲會豐富得多，你寫的讀書報告也會有分量得多。
3．對所讀著作的贊揚與批評需要有見地，避免公式化的贊美之詞用得過多，贊要贊到作品的節骨眼上，最好是這本書獨有的、最突出的優點。批評當然比贊揚更難，因為寫讀書報告的人學養往往遜於作者，要能指出一本書的缺點，而又能言之成理，使人信服，實在並非易事。但不容易並不表示不可以這樣做，如果做得到，這篇讀書報告會更容易受到欣賞。
4．讀書報告可對一本書全面論述，全面的結果很容易流於浮面，樣樣都談到了，但只是泛泛之論，倒不如抓住你最有感受、最有心得的幾點來談。因為你談得集中、深入，自然能給讀者比較深刻的印象。
5．好的讀書報告應以寫報告人自己的意見為主要內容，原文可以作為舉例加以引述，但不宜太多。引述其它人對這本書的看法也要適可而止，一、讀書報告的內容可包括：
1．本書的概況：作者簡介、內容概要；本書在表達、處理等方面的特別之處等；
2．本書的主要觀點、意圖；
3．本書的精華部分或個人最喜愛的部分；
4．對本書的評價和觀感；
5．讀後感：（1）書中情節引起的聯想
（2）書中內容引起的疑問
（3）本書令你有何提醒、啟發及反思
（4）本書引起的思想上的轉變
（5）本書令你引發的期望
6．本書讀後的收獲。
二、讀書報告的撰寫步驟：
（一）閱讀著作；
（二）確立論題：每人根據閱讀感受，自由選取一個自己最感興趣的角度確立一個論題；選擇的角度要小，挖掘要深；
（三）收集資料：1、摘記原文：根據論題，摘錄原著中的相關內容，製成摘記卡；
2、查閱其他書籍雜志，掌握相關的資料。
（四）報告的內容：選題理由、確立觀點、論述觀點
（五）注意點：語言的流暢、觀點與論述的一致。
三、寫讀書報告的注意事項
1．讀書報告的形式多種多樣，沒有任何規范。可以寫成很抒情的散文，很尖銳的評論，很精闢的分析，很周詳的比較……要看書的性質，也要看你感想的性質。
2．讀書時要邊看邊寫，不論有什麼感想，疑問和見解，都隨即把它們寫下來。最好准備一本讀書札記簿，寫在本子上。書看完了，把自己寫下來的那些感受瀏覽一次，就會發現幾個重要可以發揮的。把這幾個重點列出來，有時間的話，把書有選擇地再看一遍，以便你想論述的重點，找尋更多的資料或例證。有需要時，還可以再找其它有關的書籍來補充你的論點。這樣，你閱讀的收獲會豐富得多，你寫的讀書報告也會有分量得多。
3．對所讀著作的贊揚與批評需要有見地，避免公式化的贊美之詞用得過多，贊要贊到作品
⑥ 英文讀書報告
寫古埃及的書，給你兩篇讀後感：
The ancient Egyptians are an enring source of fascination--mummies and pyramids, curses and rituals have captured our imaginations for generations. We all have a mental picture of ancient Egypt, but is it the right one? How much do we really know about this once great civilization? In this absorbing introction, Ian Shaw, one of the foremost authorities on Ancient Egypt, describes how our current ideas about Egypt are based not only on the thrilling discoveries made by early Egyptologists but also on fascinating new kinds of evidence proced by modern scientific and linguistic analyses. He also explores the changing influences on our responses to these finds, by examining the impact of Egyptology on various aspects of popular culture such as literature, cinema, opera, and contemporary art. He considers all aspects of ancient Egyptian culture, from tombs and mummies to the discovery of artefacts and the decipherment of hieroglyphs, and from despotic pharaohs to animal-headed gods. From the general reader interested in Ancient Egypt, to students and teachers of ancient history and archaeology, to museum-goers, this Very Short Introction will not disappoint.
Be careful to buy this book only if you want to learn about Egyptology as an academic discipline, more than about what scholars think really went on in ancient Egypt. This book is a learned and fascinating introction to the study of ancient Egypt. If you are looking to understand how scholars painstakingly piece together tiny shards of ambiguous and insufficient evidence to construct an understanding of ancient Egypt, this is your book. If you seek a primer the current state of knowledge on life, religion, politics, culture, and society in ancient Egypt, you should probably buy another book. I bought the book out of a desire to learn more about what current scholarly thinking about ancient Egypt in order to open up a window on that fascinating civilization. Instead, I discovered a compelling (if dry) narrative on how Egyptologists work and reach conclusions. This is a really interesting topic in its own right, and, of course, it is fundamental to evaluating what is presented as "what we know" about ancient Egypt in an intelligent fashion. However, you might not want to spend time learning about Egyptology, but instead want to learn about ancient Egypt. If so, this is likely not the book for you right now
The title of this excellent entry in an excellent series should be 'Egyptology', as it is more about the study of ancient Egypt than the history itself. At 190 pages, it is a little longer than many entries in this series, but the final 30 of those pages are References, Timeline and so on, which provide a good springboard for further study.
Pharaonic Egypt was Earth's first great empire and it lasted for 3 millennia. The author examines the way in which that civilization has been perceived, interpreted and mythologized by, among others, Victorians seeking verification of Biblical stories and by modern, popular culture.
Ian Shaw writes well and comes across as an erudite and objective scholar. He has not used this book as an opportunity to put forward any unorthodoxy of his own, and has not been afraid to include many quotations from other Egyptologists. All of this makes the book a perfect introction to this fascinating subject.
agree with the other reviewers that this book is not so much about Ancient Egypt as it is about Egyptology. I would say it even expects a previous knowledge of the periods and dynasties of Ancient Egypt. In that respect it fails to live up to its title.
As a book about Egyptology it's slightly dry and not very tight. The author seems to be all over the place. After reading this book, I have learned very little of Egyptology as a discipline except for a few theories expounded in the text.
I would not recommend this book. I am interested in reading Egyptian Myth: A very short introction as a possible better introction to Egyptian history, myths, and beliefs.
2
I knew absolutely nothing about ancient Egypt and cared less. I was still fascinated by this book and inspired to follow it up.
It starts with the Narmer Palette, an artefact in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, and uses the decoration on both sides, pictures and hieroglyphs, to explain some of the things we think we know about ancient Egypt and how we think we know them. It's thought the elegantly outlined depression between the serpopards was used for crushing pigment for eyeshadow....serpopards? Leopards with the heads and neck of snakes.
The book goes on to look specifically at how we establish the narrative history of ancient history (or rather, perhaps, speculate about it rather than establish it), the roles of kings, and the issues of identity (the significance of race and gender in particular) and of religion (mummification, the pyramids and so on). Ancient Egypt really was ancient - the Pharaonic period started 5000 years ago and the timeline in the book goes further back than that - and covered a very long period, lasting into the Roman era AD. It's not surprising perhaps that it's very hard to "know" much, and of course, things will have changed quite a lot in the thousands of years covered by the Egyptian era.
In particular the book exposes some of the conflicts between archeologists, who look at what's left of the buildings and artifacts, and those who read and interpret the writing and hieroglyphs found on them. It had never occurred to me that there might be a division like that.
There is an outline of the rise of Egyptology in the nineteenth century, the mistakes made by early investigators which may have destroyed important evidence (and why they made the mistakes), and, finally some discussion of the impact of ancient Egypt on the twentieth century. This short section gives equal space to the Anthony and Cleopatras of Burton and Taylor on the one hand and of Kenneth Williams and Amanda Barrie on the other - this book has its feet on the ground.
There are good illustrations to support the text (full-page photos of both sides of the Narmer Palette, for example, so you see exactly what the author is writing about), a glossary and several pages of further reading and useful websites.
I was really surprised at being drawn in so thoroughly. Fascinating introction.
另一篇哲學方面的書：
The last great mystery for science, consciousness has become a controversial topic. Consciousness: A Very Short Introction challenges readers to reconsider key concepts such as personality, free will, and the soul. How can a physical brain create our experience of the world? What creates our identity? Do we really have free will? Could consciousness itself be an illusion? Exciting new developments in brain science are opening up these debates, and the field has now expanded to include biologists, neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers. This book clarifies the potentially confusing arguments and clearly describes the major theories, with illustrations and lively cartoons to help explain the experiments. Topics include vision and attention, theories of self, experiments on action and awareness, altered states of consciousness, and the effects of brain damage and drugs. This lively, engaging, and authoritative book provides a clear overview of the subject that combines the perspectives of philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience--and serves as a much-needed launch pad for further exploration of this complicated and unsolved issue.
I have to admit that at first I dismissed this little introction to consciousness, but then I read the book again. It's a gem. Blackmore makes it all clear right up front what the problem of consciousness is and several ways that consciousness might be defined. She considers whether consciousness is some integral feature of brain processes or something in addition to the physical features of the brain (a position that goes by the clumsy name of "epiphenomenalism"). Next she talks about a last Cartesian section in the thinking of some materialists called "the Cartesian theatre", a phrase coined by Daniel Dennett that means that some scientists have embraced the material operation of the brain but still believe that consciousness is something that appears at a place and time in the brain. It as if there is a little theatre in the brain where consciousness is played.
Blackmore next questions the natural or intuitive idea that consciousness is present in a continuous stream: this is a grand illusion and how the brain may create this illusion is investigated. She focuses on visual perceptual consciousness and presents research that questions our natural understanding of what is going on with our brains while we experience the world. There follows a consideration of "the self" (a useful construction, it seems), conscious will, and altered states of consciousness (psychedelic drugs, meditation, and out-of-body experiences). All in all this is a brief, but very clear and stimulating discussion of consciousness. I find it remarkable that so much was packed in a little volume that left me stimulated and grateful instead of exhausted, bored, or confused.
It's just a great place to begin trying to get a grip on what the fuss is and why consciousness is such a curious and marvelous phenomenon.
No one book can cover all there is to say about the burgening field of Consciousness Studies of Consciousness Research, but this book comes as close as any one up-to-date one can; furthermore, it has all the usual physical advantages of Oxford University Press' "Very Short Introction" titles: small enough to actually fit into a pockes yet so well bound that when carried so the spine will never crack nor pages ever fall out.
Susan Blackmore's experience as a Zen meditator adds depth to the section on altered states of consciousness as well as to her final summary on the future of consciousness and consciousness research.
A minor disappointment was the abscence of any treatment of Artificial Intelligence and the philosophical problems it raises, especially unfortunate since she sha covered that subtopic well and thoroughly in a longer book. Also some cartoon drawings are rudimentary and add little to the text, but on the other hand, some photographic, do-it-yourself demonstrations of how our conciousness differs from what we believe we introspectively know it to be are excellent.
Another positive for any book but especially one suitable as an initial introction to a topic is an excellent bibliography for further reading.
2
I first encountered Blackmore's work when, after searching long and hard for a scientific explanation of out-of-body experiences, I came across her book Beyond the Body. It was astonishingly well researched and offered a rational, convincing explanation for phenomena that were usually neglected by the scientific community. I became an instant fan and have followed her work ever since. But now, alas, she has aligned herself with the Dawkins/Dennett axis of drivel, and my loyalty to her is badly shaken. In this book (a shorter version of her Consciousness: An Introction) she follows Dennett by denying the existence of consciousness and then inlging in much speculation about the properties and evolutionary history of this non-existent entity. Consciousness, she maintains, is an 'illusion', which she defines as something that exists but does not have the properties it appears to have. She then proceeds to discuss it as if it does not in fact exist, and slips into calling it a 'delusion', which she apparently regards as a synonymous term. So far, so Dennett. She follows Dawkins by labeling just about everything a 'meme' (as Poe might have said 'All that we see or seem is but a meme within a meme'), unless she happens not to approve of it, in which case it is 'a virus of the mind'. As an example, she inlges in a quite intemperate and completely irrelevant rant against religion, in which Roman Catholicism is described as a parasitic infection. Like Dennett and Dawkins, she leaves no axe unground.
So why do I give the book 5 stars if I disagree with so much of it? Well, I guess you can't keep a good scientist down, and Blackmore is still a great scientist. She brings considerable knowledge and erudition to the subject, presents fair summaries of opposing views, and gives excellent descriptions of odd phenomena like Libet's Delay and the Cutaneous Rabbit. And her style is as readable as ever. I was suspicious when I saw that her son Jolyon had contributed many of the illustrations - it smacked of nepotism - but I have to say his drawings are really charming and add greatly to the text. The other illustrations are useful too - with the possible exception of a photograph of the author opening a fridge door - which isn't always the case with this series. The book ends with a very useful Further Reading list. It's thus an excellent introction to the subject (although I think John Searle's The Mystery of Consciousness is still the best place to start).
So, I shall keep the faith and continue to read everything Susan Blackmore publishes. I just hope that one day, just as she once abandoned a belief in the paranormal, she sees the light and abandons the axis of drivel.
3Scientists try to approach the function of the human brain just as they approach the functioning of any other organ in our bodies: as a natural feature of the natural world. According to this view, what we call our "mind" is dependent upon the physical brain, making the mind just as natural and material as other biological processes like digestion. Even so, it's difficult to entirely escape the lure of alism — the view that "mind" is completely separate from and independent of the physical brain. Usually alism is accompanied by the belief that the mind is basically the soul — an immaterial, eternal "thing" which represents our true selves. This view has been promoted by theistic religions for millennia.
Because research into the nature and functioning of the brain is still in its relatively early stages, there's a lot of open ground and disputed ideas. Scientific researchers are not united behind a single explanation or way of conceptualizing how the brain creates the mind and consciousness. This means that there is a lot to read and digest before you can claim to at least understand where the current research stands — but fortunately there is a good place to start. Susan Blackmore's Consciousness: A Very Short Introction is part of Oxford University Press "very short introction" series and, like other volumes, does a great job at explaining even complicated issues in a way that is comprehensible and engaging for even a general audience. Perhaps the most significant problem in the study of human consciousness is whether there is real problem there or not.
Some argue that there are "easy problems" like explaining how processes like perception and memory work, then the "hard problem" of explaining how consciousness itself works. Others argue that there is no "hard problem" because if we can explain all the "easy problems," then we will have explained consciousness (or at least the explanation for consciousness will immediately and obviously follow). The difference can stated as: is consciousness an "extra thing" or "extra ingredient" in our minds, or is any sufficiently advanced mental processing system also necessarily "conscious"?
For many religious theists, this question necessarily turns on the existence of a soul. Machines and robots cannot be "conscious," for example, because they cannot have souls — only God can imbue a living being with a soul and it cannot automatically appear simply because a system becomes complex enough. Even some scientists who don't believe in souls will agree that simply having all the same parts and complexities as a human brain would not lead to consciousness, but many others think that it would. This means that efforts to create a "conscious" machine will have profound implications for the common belief in alism, souls, and a "mind" that is immaterial, supernatural, and separate from the physical brain.
Like most scientists and researchers, Blackmore rejects the traditional religious explanations for the mind: she rejects alism, she rejects the existence of a mind or soul that is independent of the brain, and she rejects the idea that the mind is in any way eternal.
Consciousness: A Very Short Introction, by Susan BlackmoreBlackmore goes further than most, however, and is inclined to believe that even the existence of a coherent, consistent "self" is likely an illusion. Most scientists seem to be trying to hold on to this, and intuitively it is something that seems to be true. There is a significant amount of evidence and logic which suggests otherwise, though — and if it's true that our traditional, intuitive notion of consistent self is wrong, then what does this say about the existence of a soul?
Although Susan Blackmore certainly has her own views, this doesn't interfere with her explanations — readers won't get the feeling that she is only setting up straw men to attack or that she's giving short shrift to views she doesn't accept. She doesn't hide her own perspective, but she also doesn't let it get in the way of giving readers a broad ecation in where current research stands, what different researchers think, and of course possible problems with it all.
Blackmore doesn't cover everything, of course, nor could she in a short introction like this. Yet she does cover plenty, and anyone simply looking for an overview of the field will get all they need. If someone would like more detailed information, a good follow-up would be Blackmore's Conversations on Consciousness, where she interviews many leading researchers to ask them what they think and why.
⑦ 寫篇英語閱讀報告，字數多些
《老人與海》閱讀報告
Reading Report for "The old man and the sea"
《老人與海》是海明威於1951年在古巴寫的一篇中篇小說,於1952年出版.是海明威最著名的作品之一.它圍繞一位老年古巴漁夫,與一條巨大的馬林魚在離岸很遠的灣流中搏鬥而展開故事的講述.它奠定了海明威在世界文學中的突出地位,這篇小說相繼獲得了1953年美國普利策獎和1954年諾貝爾文學獎.
"The old man and the sea" is a novella written by Hemingway in Cuba in 1951, was published in 1952. Hemingway is one of the most famous works. It revolves aroundan old Cuban fisherman, and a huge marlin far offshore in the Gulf Stream inwhich the narrator of the story. It established Hemingway's prominent position in world literature, this novel has won the 1953 Pulitzer prize in 1954 and the USANobel prize for literature.
《老人與海》寫的是老漁夫聖地亞哥在海上的捕魚經歷:老人制服大馬林魚後,在返航途中又同鯊魚進行驚險的搏鬥.作品中的形象具有很強的象徵意蘊,他用大馬林魚象徵人生的理想和人類作為生命本身所不可避免的所具有的慾望,用鯊魚象徵無法擺脫的悲劇命運,用大海象徵變化無常的人類社會,而獅子則是勇武健壯、仇視邪惡、能創造奇跡的象徵,聖地亞哥則是人類中的勇士與強大勢力搏鬥的「硬漢子」代表,他那捕魚的不幸遭遇象徵人類總是與厄運不斷抗爭卻無論如何都無法試圖去改變命運.「一艘船越過世界的盡頭,駛向未知的大海,船頭上懸掛著一面雖然飽經風雨剝蝕卻依舊艷麗無比的旗幟,旗幟上,舞著雲龍一般的四個字閃閃發光——超越極限!」作者海明威是這樣評價他的作品《老人與海》的.
"The old man and the sea" is written, the old fisherman Santiago at sea fishingexperience: the old uniform marlin, on the return voyage with shark thriller. The figures in her works has symbolic meaning is very strong, he used the big marlinsymbol of the ideal of life and human life as the inevitable with the symbol ofdesire, can not escape the tragic fate of sharks, sea symbol with constantly changing society, while the lion is the symbol of the chivalrous robust, hatred of evil, can create a miracle Santiago is, in human and powerful warriors fight "hard man", his fishing misfortune symbol of human is always with doom constantly struggle but in any case not to try to change the fate of. "A boat across the end of the world, into the unknown sea, the bow hanging on the side, though furrowed by rain and wind erosion is still colorful flags, banners, four words danced Yunlong general sparkling -- beyond the limit!" Author Hemingway commented on his work"the old man and the sea".
⑧ 寫篇英語閱讀報告
The title : Diary of a Wimpy Kid
The author : Jeff Kinney
Publisher : Omnibook Publishers Co.
The no. of pages : 350
The book is about : The boy who called Gregory had a worst summer. His mother asked him to read novel but he didn't like. His father bought a dog but it always gave him some troubles. His older brother fooled with him and these made him felt unhappy. His friend - Rowley went to a club with him. After that, they owe a little money and they should go to work to get this money. But their friendship was getting worse and worse.
My favourite character : Gregory's mother
It is because : She cares with her children and husband very much. She is also full of mother love.
I like this book because: From the story, I can learn something that when we do anything, we should use our effort. In addition, our friendship is more important than anything that we can't use money to buy it.
⑨ 英語閱讀報告 題目:從書中你學到了怎麼 應該寫怎麼 例如學會了更多單詞 麻煩舉五個例子
記住：要死記硬背是一條很艱難的路。為什麼歌曲聽幾遍我們就能記住，而一篇英語作文記不住。歸根結底，死記
⑩ 英語閱讀的讀書報告怎麼寫
讀書報告，關鍵是要認真解讀好英語的閱讀。